|
The
Marketplace MasterTM
is a monthly email publication on professional service
marketing from Expertise Marketing, LLC.
Seasons
Greetings
Best
holiday wishes to all my subscribers, friends, colleagues,
and clients!
Most
of us in the professional services field will agree
that 2005 was a better year than the last few years.
For one thing, newspapers are devoting far less ink
to plunging profits, painful layoffs and breathtaking firm implosions. But
the latest batch of good news (or lack of bad news)
doesn’t mean we can get complacent about our firms’
long-term marketing strategies.
This
end-of-the-year issue sums up some of my observations
on dealing with the hot and cold nature of the professional
services marketplace.
Also,
many, many thanks to all of you who participated in
the Marketing Effectiveness Study. We’ve collected
all the responses, and will spend the next several weeks
analyzing the data. Those of you who took the survey
will be seeing a complimentary report of the results first.
One
last thing. Are you curious about what percentage
of sales firms invest in external PR agencies?
If so, don’t miss our TalkBack
section, below.

Suzanne
Lowe
Author, Marketplace Masters: How Professional Service
Firms Compete to Win
President, Expertise Marketing, LLC
Keeping Cool When the Marketplace Starts to Boil
If
only clients would stand still. How much easier our
lives as professional service providers would be if
client needs were consistent year after year and their
marketplaces were never buffeted by changes from the
economy or competition.
|
" ...consulting firms are facing a wake-up
call... Like the proverbial frog in the pot of cold
water set on a hot stove, many of them will slowly
cook without ever realizing what’s happening." |
It
sounds ridiculous to expect this from clients and their
markets, but in reality there are plenty of service
firms that operate as if their clients are standing
still. Let’s face it: operating a professional
services firm is a complex task! With people as the
“product,” there is of necessity a significant
internal focus. Moreover, most people respond well to
short-term requirements, and not so effectively to longer-term
strategies. Naturally, these factors can lead to leaders
being distracted from the myriad changes that are taking
place in their own marketplaces. As a result, they’re
always playing catch-up with their competitors, too
rarely taking advantage of opportunities to branch out
into emerging – and profitable – markets.
It’s
understandable that firms focus on short-term results
when it has served them well in the past. Back then,
life was good. Engagements were huge. Hourly fees were
hefty. Clients accepted whoever was assigned to their
project. “Talent wars” of the 1990s drove
double-digit revenue growth. But a focus on long-term
growth was lacking then, and it still is now.
Temperature
Shifts in the Consulting Marketplace
Take
the consulting industry, for example. Whether they’re
doing too much – too blindly – or too little,
consulting firms are facing a wake-up call. Now that
the recession has ended, too many management and IT
consultants are heaving a premature sigh of relief that
things can now get back to the way it was in the high
times. What many either don’t realize or fail
to act on is the fact that the
marketplace has shifted. Like the proverbial frog in
the pot of cold water set on a hot stove, many of them
will slowly cook without ever realizing what’s
happening.
What
shifts have already happened? One of the biggest is
a competitor that consultants always hoped wouldn’t
appear: the client. Clients are increasingly using their
own internal consulting resources rather than hiring
outside help. These days, it’s less expensive
to own talent than to rent it for $250,000 a year –
in fact clients might hire two internal people for that
price!
How
did clients become the hot water that boils their consulting
frogs? Some clients pose a competitive threat because
they suffer from “service fatigue.” After
a time consuming those stand-still services, clients’
expectations get raised beyond what it is possible to
deliver. A sure sign of fatigue is when they start staffing
up to handle the work internally. (Boiling water, indeed!)
And
clients are also more discerning about who is assigned
to their teams. Wet-behind-the-ears MBAs charged at
big-firm rates are no longer acceptable. Clients are
increasingly interviewing potential consulting team
members and rejecting those who will gain more value
from the job than they’ll deliver. Despite this
trend, the recruiting teams at many consulting firms
are hopping this year. After all, their partner compensation
models depend on an influx of new frog-princes.
Smaller
engagements are another signal of pots that are heating
up. Some firms are staying put and accepting what’s
available. Others are jumping to cooler water. IBM,
a savvy competitor, recently announced a significantly
strengthened company wide focus on providing technology
and consulting services for small- and medium-sized
companies. Only time will tell if IBM's leap into this
pot will help the firm achieve a longer-term competitive
advantage.
Stagnant
hourly fees have become the norm. Let’s face it:
Firms are selling harder to win smaller engagements,
work longer hours, and earn the same revenues. Feels
like hot water to me!
One
last sign of boiling water is merger and acquisition
activity. Since the beginning of 2005, 20 percent of
the global HR consulting market has changed hands. And
some firms, like Towers Perrin and EDS, have set up
alliances with high hopes for significant growth. But
will this move turn them into princes? It’s more
likely if they’ve also built their firms’
market-driven infrastructures.
Know
Thy Marketplace… and Master It
There’s
no argument that consulting firms are trying to gain
marketplace traction. Just look at the new alliances
that IT firms are forming with offshore partners for
an example. But the landscape is littered with too many
boiled frogs.
We
need only look to the recent Internet bubble for evidence
of marketplace myopia carnage. marchFIRST
was an Internet consulting firm that hired legions of
eager Web experts for what they thought would be an
endless stream of deep-pocketed clients. Their Web site
now offers only bankruptcy documents and information
on claims for former employees.
It’s
hard to avoid the truth. Too many consulting firms,
even though they weathered the recent recession, still
haven’t fostered a real understanding of their
marketplace, made strategically effective internal efforts
to compete, and / or created a robust framework for
systemic innovation.
An
even more sobering truth is that this situation exists
beyond the management and IT consulting arenas. Take
a look at your own professional service sector: do these
scenarios ring a bell? Arguably, only the accounting
sector, as a result of sweeping changes related to Sarbanes-Oxley
legislation, has had to truly examine its role in the
marketplace, and make appropriate shifts.
Stay
Cool: Build a Market-Driven Infrastructure
Firms
with a good handle on what’s happening in their
business environment are more adept at handling short-term
crises and long-term shifts. They’re armed with
information to help them detect the marketplace’s
temperature. They’re prepared with market-driven
processes, tools, and protocols to jump to another pot
when the heat starts to rise.
It
takes building a market-driven infrastructure –
a consulting frog’s best friend when faced with
boiling water.
Let’s
look at a few concrete examples of how any professional
service firm could master its marketplace by building
a market driven infrastructure.
Put
market research in the budget –
nearly 60 percent of the firms we’ve studied did
not have a formal market research budget. Yet those
that did found that they were two to five times more
effective at attracting and retaining clients.
Differentiate
your firm – Find an uncopyable “sweet-spot”
where your firm can stand alone. Although 81 percent
of our researched firms think they are differentiated,
they’re actually confusing differentiation with
image enhancement and brand messaging. Professional
firms must learn the difference and pursue their own
path where engagements are destined to grow, competitors
will be few and fees will be high.
Mine
customer data - data mining can deliver solid
competitive results. Only 30 percent of the firms we
studied tap their contact database's strategic potential
for mining and using valuable data. But those firms
that practiced data mining were two to three times more
likely to be successful in attracting and retaining
clients than those that did not.
Pay
attention to your firm’s culture
– not all marketing strategies work for all types
of firms. Understanding – and aligning marketing
strategies to maximize their competitive advantages
to the firm -- can mean the difference between marketplace
leadership or mediocrity.
Use
R&D to innovate your service portfolio
– R&D isn’t just for product development.
Follow the lead of RSM
McGladrey, which wanted to move beyond its traditional
accounting and consulting silos toward totally new and
effectively integrated services. From 2001 to 2004,
the firm employed a new notion of R&D: a highly
experiential client-and-consultant learning laboratory.
The move paid off with a revitalized professional development
program and a noticeable uptick in revenues from the
clients that attended its learning events. Intentional
R&D efforts like this are the reasons why RSM McGladrey
is making significant inroads in the marketplace.
The
new millennium has brought new realities: professional
service firms must cultivate a more astute understanding
of their marketplace – and they must make the
leap to cooler waters when the pot starts to boil. They
must learn from the experience of the high-flying 1990s:
clients and marketplaces are constantly shifting. When
we look back at firms that thrived during the 2000s,
we’ll remember the ones that had a market-driven
infrastructure that helped them monitor the temperature
of the marketplace and know when and how to react.
 |
TalkBack
- Measuring PR Budget as a Percentage of Sales
After
our last two articles on Methods
of Measuring Marketing ROI and the ACNielsen
Case Study we heard from Bruce Hokanson.
Bruce is the vice president in charge of the
semiconductor practice for Loomis
Group, a marketing and public relations
firm with offices in San Francisco, Austin,
Boston, and Paris.
Bruce
asked if we had ever collected data on the average
percentage of sales that firms invest in their
PR agencies. We don’t have specific data
on PR, but thought it was a great question.
Chances are, you’d be interested to know
what other firms spend on PR too. So, we’ve
created a mini survey with Bruce’s questions.
We’ll tabulate the responses and share
them in a future newsletter.
- Does
your company provide products or services?
- Is your business in B2B or consumer markets?
- Is your company in the high-tech field?
- What percentage of annual sales does your
company invest specifically in outside PR
help?
- What ROI metrics do you use to quantify
your investment in PR?
Click
here to answer these five questions
(www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=977411594885)
|
 |
 |
 |
Take the confidential, web-based Marketplace Masters
professional
service firm differentiation assessment test for
instant feedback on whether your firm is doing differentiation
right.
Your
feedback is important to us. Please contact
us with your comments and questions.
©
2005 Expertise
Marketing, LLC All Rights Reserved |