If this email does not display properly, you may read it online.
This month: No More Spinning Wheels - Carl Roehling and Susan Arneson of SmithGroup
 
 
April 2007 
Click to visit the Marketplace Masters website
 

Subscribe
Did a colleague forward this newsletter? Sign up to receive your own copy.
Click to Subscribe to our e-newsletter on marketing professional services

News

Upcoming Speeches:

Measuring Marketing Effectiveness, Control System Integrators Association conference, Sante Fe, NM, April 27, 2007

Convert Your Marketing Role into a Strategic Firm Leadership Position, SMPS-PSMA Build Business 2007 National Conference, Washington DC, August 27, 2007

Articles and Publications:

Suzanne Lowe contributed to: Marketing Metrics De-Mystified: Methods for Measuring ROI and Evaluating Your Marketing Effort, by Sally Handley FSMPS, President of Sally Handley, Inc.. Sally is an adjunct faculty member at Pratt Institute in Manhattan, where she teaches Marketing /Communications for design firms.

Practice Management: Re-evaluate how you evaluate your marketer (PDF), by Suzanne Lowe and Sally Glick for Accounting Today, September 2006 (also published with permission on The Marcus Letter)

Why You May Not be Truly Differentiated, Consulting News, September 2006 (available to CN subscribers only)

Hallmarks of an Effective CMO (PDF), The Marketer, August 2006

New from the Expertise Marketplace Blog

Lawyers ahead of management consultants

Nothing new to say?

Show me the money

See all the posts at the Expertise Marketplace blog

Subscribe to the blog's RSS feed for regular updates. (Need RSS help?)


Recent Issues

  • Marketer on a Mission, March 2007
  • Setting "Give-up Goals" to Get Closer to Clients," February 2007
  • Doing Things Differently – A New Year, A New Direction, January 2007

    You can order Marketplace Masters from Barnes & Noble, Amazon, your favorite online bookseller, or CEO-READ.


    The Marketplace Master™ is a monthly email publication on professional service marketing from Expertise Marketing, LLC.


    Pushing back on a "push back"

    For most privately held professional service firms (PSFs), leadership requires a delicate balancing act between cajoling, building consensus, and weeding through the inevitable sycophants to work with real team players. This balancing act is especially tricky when one tries to lead a group of highly intelligent, independent thinkers to do something they perceive to be difficult: like measuring marketing.

    A little more than a year ago, Larry Bodine and I published our 2006 study "Increasing Marketing Effectiveness at Professional Firms." Our findings confirmed the nascent state of marketing metrics in most professional service firms. As we catalogued the respondents’ early successes, one thing was clear: in PSFs, there is no small level of professional passion being applied by individual leaders to make cultural shifts toward being more results-oriented.

    These leaders' efforts have to be considerable, partly because most professional practitioners are passionate about serving their clients; their focus is appropriately external. And the work required to measure marketing and business development initiatives requires an internal, sometimes very personal, focus. Again and again in our study, respondents cited "pushback" from their colleagues who questioned the ROI of measuring ROI. In essence, their colleagues said, "Prove it to me that undertaking all this measurement effort will bring an obvious benefit to our firm. Otherwise, please leave me alone."

    This month's Marketplace Master™ issue features two service firm leaders who exemplify significant professional bravery. Even though the results from the effort weren't immediately clear – and are still in process – they urged colleagues to "do things differently" toward an outcome that they believe will benefit the entire firm and its clients.

    Their names are Carl Roehling and Susan Arneson -- president and CEO, and corporate marketing director, respectively -- for architecture, engineering, interiors, and planning firm SmithGroup. Roehling and Arneson have led, for the last two years, the most thoughtfully planned, well coordinated and deeply integrated embrace of marketing measurement I have seen for an enterprise of their size. As you read their story, it will become clear why Roehling and Arneson are succeeding in overcoming their own colleagues' measurement "pushback."

    Suzanne Lowe


    Suzanne Lowe

    Author, Marketplace Masters: How Professional Service Firms Compete to Win
    President, Expertise Marketing, LLC



    No More Spinning Wheels!

    In my experience, there are two reasons why organizations pursue change: after encountering a significantly negative crisis, or after being presented with a rational case that makes it compellingly clear change must be embraced, or else the organization will suffer a significantly negative crisis.

    Carl Roehling
    Carl Roehling
    Susan Arneson
    Susan Arneson

    Historically, at SmithGroup, as with many other professional service firms, practitioners spent a large amount of time working under the amorphous billing code called "Marketing." When pressed, most professionals could explain their activities as somehow related to bringing in new business, but it was challenging at best to track results related to their efforts. In response, Carl Roehling and Susan Arneson have formulated a plan to build a better framework for measuring marketplace effectiveness.

    Roehling: It was a common assumption among our partners that if you spent time and money on marketing, you would necessarily bring in more revenue. However, there was no direct correlation between marketing dollars spent and how effective we were. It doesn't mean our partners weren't busy. They were just not generating the kind of return on investment that we had targeted.

    " …if SmithGroup wants to be strategically competitive, we will have to get smarter about measurement."
               - Carl Roehling, SmithGroup

    For me, it's critically important to spend time effectively. I've had strong feelings about being results-oriented for a long time. I knew I had to make the case that if SmithGroup wants to be strategically competitive, we will have to get smarter about measurement.

    It was like going through a battle. Starting about two years ago, we got all our partners to agree that marketing money is the most strategic resource we have to spend. More than training, more than information technology, marketing is the way we will realize our vision and strategy for the future. From there, it was a case of providing our partners with meaningful and credible feedback that would allow them to correlate their decisions in marketing with their successes in strategic planning.

    Arneson: Once we got consensus that becoming more effective was a good business idea, I went out and researched every metric that we have ever seen or heard in our architecture / engineering industry. Repeat work, work-under-contract, hit rate -- I found about 30 metrics in all, all of which are tossed around in our industry indiscriminately, and with significant inconsistency on the real definition of each metric. We realized three things: 1) we would need our partners’ agreement on a simple set of metrics – and how we would define them -- across the firm; 2) we would need to incorporate our accounting department so that our metrics had financial credibility; and 3) we would need to streamline our reporting practices, from the highly variable information generated by each unit, toward a consistent set of metrics and reports.

    Roehling: We also knew that we would have to employ metrics that would point to clear actions, and that would reinforce a change in behavior. Our people need information that helps them filter out the noise. We didn't want them dealing with monthly hit rates, for instance; only hit rates at the end of a year. We wanted our metrics to help us see significant trends. With these guidelines, we picked "Repeat Work" as a key metric for SmithGroup.

    Arneson: We defined "Repeat Work" in a way that made sense to our practitioners and our accounting colleagues. For example, we learned that if a client exhibits some type of accounting activity within a 24-month period, our accounting unit considers that to be an existing client. If there is no accounting activity within 24 months, they consider that to be an inactive client and they archive the related client records. Therefore, even if we’ve worked in some way with a client in the past, but not in the last two years, we view them as a new client. The rationale is that with client turnover, and the ins-and-outs of new decision-makers, we are essentially investing in developing a new client relationship (with all its associated costs). By attaching our definition of "Repeat Work" to an accounting function, it gives us a basis for real data. We decided that we would measure this metric on a quarterly basis.

    Roehling: This metric did a few things for us. First, by measuring Repeat Work, we are able to give positive feedback to those individuals who are not typically directly responsible for marketing. For instance, our technical staff also helps to take care of clients. We want to be able to tell them they are doing a great job. That's why it makes sense to look at how much new business we’re winning from our marketing investment and the volume of repeat business generated from existing clients. Second, while our goal is to disproportionately invest in new business initiatives, we also want to give principals evidence of why they should consider allocating some of their marketing budget to focus on current clients. This real data helps them make those strategic decisions.

    Persisting . . . One Step at a Time

    As Roehling and Arneson introduced their new measurement concepts at the end of 2005, they were clear-eyed about the magnitude of the mindset shift they sought from their colleagues. They divided up their internal campaign: Arneson worked to guide the marketing team, and, at key meetings, Roehling briefed his partners, executive committee members and the SmithGroup board members. Both collaborated with corporate Accounting and the Director of Operations for each of the firm’s offices.

    At first, there was consternation. Questions abounded: "You want me to do WHAT?" Roehling and Arneson uncovered organizational barriers they never knew existed. But, convinced that shifting to embrace measurement would bring positive results, they persisted. They successfully argued to make changes in the independent, parallel tracking systems that had been used historically by the firm’s different offices. Now there is a new single system which consolidates all relevant measurement data. Roehling reports: "We made the system support the process."

    Arneson and Roehling are about to unveil their first whole year of quarterly reports. The two admit that they have had false starts, and are still experimenting with optimal ways to measure and report results. Arneson says, "The partners have been getting 11 x 17 spread sheets that make their eyes glaze over. But with the increasing amount of data that we already have coming in, we are developing easy-to-read trend charts that will help them quickly review and interpret information they're getting."

    Roehling adds: "Ideally, the trend lines will help us move beyond our previous approach to annual budgeting based on what people did in the past. We'll wean ourselves off activities that are not paying off, and start making wiser, more informed wagers on new markets."

    A New Institutional Memory

    I've written in the past about how important it is for organizations to act as one entity, with each individual doing his or her part to move the enterprise toward a favorable marketplace goal for all. The SmithGroup story is a microcosm of how individuals begin the ripple effect outward: from professional passion, to compelling rationale, to forging common ground, to taking steps collaboratively, and finally to fostering a new cultural mindset and institutional memory of "the way we do things here."

    In our conversations, Arneson and Roehling declared themselves convinced that SmithGroup’s shift toward measurement will bring positive results. They called their work a long-term investment.

    I call it a legacy.


    Your feedback is important to us. Please contact us with your comments and questions.


    Want to see the results from our study on marketing effectiveness? More information on the complete 80-page study and its accompanying 68-page case studies report.


    Take the confidential, web-based Marketplace Masters professional service firm differentiation assessment test for instant feedback on whether your firm is doing differentiation right.


     

    © 2007 Expertise Marketing, LLC All Rights Reserved

    e-newsletter management by Minerva Solutions, Inc.